No |
Co-ownership |
Partnership |
1. |
Co-ownership is not necessarily the result of agreement. |
Partnership is the result of agreement. |
2. |
Co-ownership does not necessarily involve community of profit or of loss. |
Partnership does involve community of profit or of loss. |
3. |
One co-owner can without the consent of others, transfer his interest, or in the case of land his equitable interest, to a stranger, so as to put him in the same position as regards the other owners as the transferor himself was before the transfer, except that in the case of a transfer by a joint tenant the stranger will become a tenant in common, or in the case of land a tenant in common in equity with the other owners. |
A Partner is in a much more restricted position. |
4. |
A co-owner is not as such the agent, real or implied, of the other co-owner. |
A partner is the agent of other partners so as far as concerns activities falling within the scope of the partnership, |
5. |
Before 1926, on the death of a co owner of free-hold land, the equitable as well as the legal interest in share was real estate. |
A deceased partner’s equitable interest in his share of partnership free-hold property was and still is treated as personal estate. |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
See Also..
-
1) Consider the following statements : A) Every promise is an agreement. B) Every agreement is a contract. C) A contrac...
-
1) Which one of the following element is not necessary for a contract ? A) Competent parties B) Reasonable terms and condition...
-
According to Salmond, in the whole range of legal theory, there is no conception more difficult than that of Possession. Possession ...
-
Let's see meaning of 'Damnum sine injuria' Meaning - Damnum means = Damage in the sense of money, Loss of comfort ...
-
1) Give correct answer : A) Void agreements are always illegal. B) Illegal agreements are always voidable . C) Illegal a...
0 comments:
Post a comment