1) The case of Moses Vs MacFarlane relates to :


A) Contingent contract



B) Quasi Contract 



C) Novation 


D) None of the above




Answer : B



2) The case of Moses Vs MacFarlane was decided by :


A) Lord Wright 


B) Lord Mansfield


C) Both (A) and (B)



D) None of the above 




Answer : B 



3) Section 68 of the Indian contract Act,1872 provides for : 



A) Claims for necessaries supplied to person incapable of contracting or on his account. 



B) Reimbursement of a person paying money due to, another,in payment of which he is interested.







C) Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act.



D) Responsibility of finder of goods .





Answer : A




4) A supplies to B , a lunatic with necessaries suitable to his condition in life . Can aA recover the value of necessaries from B ?

1) A cannot recover as B is not competent to make a contract.

2) A cannot recover as no legal action lies against B.

3) A can recover by making B's property liable.
which of  above valid reason ?


A) 1 only


B) 1 and 2.



C)  2 and 3 .


D) 3 only



Answer : B



5) Section 71 of The Indian contract Act 1872 provides for  -



A) Responsibility of finder of goods.



B) Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered by mistake or under coercion.



C) Claims for necessaries supplies to person in capable of contracting or on his account.



 D) None of the above





Answer : A

0 comments:

Post a comment

See Also..