The court has power to punish every person,  body or authority found guilty of Contempt of Court. The Contempt jurisdiction is very wide.

                The lawyer has to discharge certain duties towards the Court. But sometimes  because of the nature of duties, the lawyers and judges may get into heated dialogue which may result in contempt of court.

                Contempt by lawyers is the most pertinent problem before the Courts these days. There are several instances of misconduct, which have been taken as contempt of Court. For example, using insulting language against the judge,  making scandalous allegations against a judge, suppressing the facts to obtain favorable order, allegation of partiality and and unfairness against the judge, etc. An advocate who advises his clients to disobey the Court is. Also held liable for contempt Courts. In Bar Council election attacking judiciary is also taken, at contempt of court if a council, advocate refuses to  answer the question of the Court, is also liable for the contempt of court.


                  In Re Ajay Kumar Pandey,  A.I.R. 1998 S.C.3299 the Supreme Court has held that an advocate using intemperate language and casting unwarranted aspersion (false report) on various judicial officers is equality of gross contempt of court for not getting expected results. Court awarded punishment of sentence to 4 months simple imprisonment and fine Rs.1000 /-

                 Supreme Court in this case warned that only because a lawyers appear as a party in Person, he does not get a license to submit content of court , by intimidating  the judges or scandalizing the Court. An Advocate can use language  either in pleading or during argument which is either intemperate or unparliamentary and which has tendency to interfere in the administration of justice and undermine the dignity of the Court.


In another case Re Vijay Chandra Mishra A.I.R., 1995, SC 2348

                    Supreme Court held that to resent (to show anger) the question asked by the judge to be disrespectful to him, to question is authority, to ask question, to shout at him, to threaten him with transfer and impeachment, to use insulting language, to abuse him to dictate order, such acts of advocate tends to prevent court from performing its Duty to administer the justice and hence, are instances of contempt of court.


Narain Das vs Government of Madhya Pradesh  AIR 1974 SC 1252.

            It has been held that if a wrong or misleading statement is deliberately and willfully made by the party to a litigation with a view to obtain a favourable order, it would prejudice or interfere with the due course of the judicial proceedings and thus amount to contempt.



In another case the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vs Shrimati Annattee Remond Uttanwala (1987) Cr LJ 1038.

            An advocate was Personally engaged in earlier litigation involving a particular property and which has resulted in an eviction order against the client of the Advocate, who suppressed these fact in the pleading in subsequent proceeding brought by the wife of his client in respect of the same property and obtained an interim  injunction restraining the Municipal Corporation from interfering with the possession of the wife. Bombay High Court held the Advocate guilty of contempt .


         Justice Sawant of the Bombay High Court delivering the judgement observed that, "the contemner by suppressing the facts, had fraudulently obtained from the Courts favorable Orders and had thus prejudiced and interfered with the due course of the judicial proceeding and had also obstructed the administration of justice. That a false statement made to the court with a view to obtain a favorable order amounts to  contempt of the Court.


       Whether boycott of  Court or Strike by lawyers amount to Contempt of Court is still a controversial issue.

Tarini Mohan of pleaders, A.I.R. 1923, Cal 212 :

         In this old decided case Calcutta High Court held that the Bombay Council has no power to call strike of Lawyers and such call amount to contempt of court. It was observed that boycotting the Court, the advocates violets his duties not only towards the client but also towards the court. (See also...Duties of an Advocate towards a client)

         Many great jurist India writing, expressed their view that there is no justification for the lawyers to boycott the Court are to participate. It is taken as professional misconduct.


See also......



Duties of an Advocate

Types of contempt of courts 

Constitutional validity of the contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Punishment for Contempt of Court. 

14 comments:

  1. Great write-up, I am a big believer in commenting on blogs to inform the blog writers know that they’ve added something worthwhile to the world wide web!.. click here

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey what a brilliant post I have come across and believe me I have been searching out for this similar kind of post for past a week and hardly came across this. Thank you very much and will look for more postings from you. gpwlaw-mi.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some truly wonderful work on behalf of the owner of this internet site , perfectly great articles . Asbestos Cancer Organization

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post.! lemon law attorney in la

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really loved reading your blog. It was very well authored and easy to undertand. Unlike additional blogs I have read which are really not tht good. I also found your posts very interesting. In fact after reading. I had to go show it to my friend and he ejoyed it as well! jameslnowlin

    ReplyDelete
  6. You may even need a tax lawyer because not all tax issues can be solved by an accountant.

    עמית ורד עורך דין

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me. purchase instagram likes paypal

    ReplyDelete
  8. As a business owner, you are usually run off your feet with the challenges of operating your business. The last thing you need to worry about is a legal problem. Many business people put off dealing with a legal problem because they don't know where to turn, don't have the time, or most often, are afraid of how much it will cost and how much time it will take. The authors, experienced litigation lawyers in Toronto, Canada, offer excellent tips on how to get the best legal advice efficiently. divorce lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have a hard time describing my thoughts on content, but I really felt I should here. Your article is really great. I like the way you wrote this information. San Diego Car Accident Lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  10. A debt of gratitude is in order for your post. I've been contemplating composing an extremely tantamount post in the course of the last couple of weeks, I'll most likely keep it straightforward and connection to this rather if thats cool. Much obliged. lawyers

    ReplyDelete
  11. I truly like you're composing style, incredible data, thankyou for posting. ITTExit.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am impressed. I don't think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. You are truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog you have got here. Drinking and Driving Lawyers

    ReplyDelete
  13. Clearly, you can draft contracts all alone, you can endure frightful dealings with your business customers, you can settle a conjugal debate among yourselves yet when the need to come to court emerges, you have to get a legal counselor. child custody lawyers

    ReplyDelete

See Also..